Liberals, this topic will be over your head so don't bother to read further.
Well, if you click the title it takes you to a NY Times piece where researchers studied the impact of FOX NEWS: AKA "Murdoc Vader's Death Star"
 | paraphased from the ever eloquent and now benovelent (as a self-proclaimed involutary donator to Air America) Al Franken. Measures were observed in markets where Fox News was carried on basic cable. The net result is that there was no substancial statisitcal difference in the voting patterns.
What does this mean, you know, in normal speak? Here are my two perspectives:
1) I must confess having studied statistics, the answer is that this study is TOTALLY MEANINGLESS because you cannot PROVE CAUSALITY between the two events. Meaning there cannot be a direct link to the voting habits and Fox News linked. The study also fails to prove even a CORRELATION (meaning while not directly linked the two items share a similar change over the same time period)!
Another way of saying it is that my lunch choice had the same impact on their vote: none.
My real question is, what was their intent when they set out to spend money and effort studying Fox News in the first place?
Or to humor the TIMES:
2) To my Conservative friends I have discoverd "statisitcal proof" that we are not influenced by the left wing media! Where did this come from?
With the credentials of the researchers Stefano DellaVigna of the University of California, Berkeley, and Ethan Kaplan of the Institute for International Economic Studies at Stockholm University it would seem difficult for an objective conservative conclusion to be drawn. The TIMES journalist writes that DellaVigna and Kaplan offer "two more promising explanations" that people used Fox to "confirm previously held beliefs" and that media is "somewhat for entertainment". I would say to you that this is not entirely accurate. For comparison I would submit for your approval my explanation of what the numbers mean:
In spite of the fact that the liberal media has dominated information dissemination for the past 30 years that Conservative thought has continued to thrive. The advent of Fox news will eventually have an impact against liberalism in that there is an alternative to the leftist media for younger viewers to take in. The ratings success enjoyed by Fox would suggest that their impact has only just begun to be mesured.
In conjunction with this change, political candidates are incresingly abandoning their leftist platforms when running for office. Heck, Clinton even supported reformation of Social Security! An unheard of statement from a Democrat prior to the 90's.
Incrementalism works both ways boys and girls! Conservatives are taking back what is rightfully theirs.
Whichever one works for you, run with it. Keep the tongue in cheek, it's more fun that way!
 CINDY SHEEHAN My prayers have been with Cindy Sheehan. I have avoided blogging about Cindy's rant against the President, because I feel that in hindsight she will eventually come to regret her actions. I believe those actions are born of a justified heartfelt anger that is misplaced in focus. I am now blogging about Cindy because she has made herself the Mickey Mouse leader of the Anti-Bush movement thinly wrapped in anti-war banners. She keep opening up with disconnected hate filled rants and wonders how the focus comes off the war and on her?Here's what I see when I've reviewed media exerpts: In her first meeting with the President, Cindy was quoted as saying this: "I now know he's sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis," Cindy said after their meeting. "I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he's a man of faith."QUOTE SOURCE LINKSince then her life has started falling apart. More recent news reports say that her husband is filing for divorce, and her family has released statements that they would like for her to stop this protest.As a greiving mom, she is right to be angry. She just seems to have gone way overboard and unfortunately she's allowed the media to use her like a Jerry Springer show prop. Springer is an apt analagy as Sheehan has cursed Bush's leadership team and everyone else she can in relation to the war. She also made a hateful stab at Bush's girls with "he needs to sign up his two little party-animal girls... to go to this war". She's proving her ignorance and imbalance further by linking this war to our stance with Israel? "My son did not sign up to die for Israel"... what? It would at least be partially accurate to say this war was about oil and/or terrorism. But Israel? Cindy says the terrorists hate us for our stance on Israel? Where did THAT come from? This is the strongest voice from the extreme left aginst the war? The only ones being hurt here are those who are on the front lines just like her son. The only ones who benefit from her are those selling news and those who would seek moral victory against the evils of our country. She isn't hurting the Presiden's resolve, but she might privately be causing him some pain by demonstrating hers so forcefully. I'll continue to pray for Cindy, and you should too.
My wife dragged me (literally) to the mall the weekend that the new Potter book came out. There were hundreds of kids and adults dressed up like characters from the series. As I somewhat patiently waited on a bench outside of some kids clothing store where my wife was spending 6 hours of my hard earned income I noted a goup of thug wannabes. These wannabees crossed in front of my geezer bench at the same time as an equal number of Potterites going the opposite way. The thug wannabes in their twisted hats, soccer sport t-shirts and crotches of their pants at their knees started laughing at the wizards and quiddich players. It took a great deal of self restraint not to remind those thugs that a few years from now their "uniforms" would look quite stupid to them too. That in fact I very loosely understood the Potterites celebraton of geekdom while their thug-li-ness translates into a celebration of an anti-societal drug and gun culture. That in a few years they would be shaking their heads at the fashions of their own kids... which for some of them may be sooner than they would have planned... Just as I was formulating this rant a typical victim of McDonald's jiggled past with her rolling midriff exposed between her low riders and short shirt... VOMIT!   Now Dolce & Gabbana models are showing the "short and curlies" in their Jeans ad? I should want to remind Dolce & Gabbana that not everyone is a svelt model. That there WILL BE victims of McDonalds jigglig by in those fashions at malls everywhere in the next 12 months. Redneck poor taste has no boundaries, and apparently Europeans aren't immune to having redneck tastelesness. Y'all in Milan and New York should think about that before you pull the pants down any further. As an aside, the Potter book is an excellent read, with a dissapointing ending forcing the reader to buy the next 6 books she will be selling. I'll be buying too.
Anonymous: Death by Spam
I really like the idea of anonymous posters. It gives the general public the opportunity to slam or love me for my posts. However 6 of the last 7 comments posted are "wow, great blog-click to my link where I'm selling X..." Ugh! I guess it was bound to happen. Next I look for "registered user spamming" or even worse: "registered user ghosting to spam"!
Those who would support the horrors of abortion and take life so slightly show patterns of behavior just as serial rapists and murderers do. Now we have shock that French doctors have been hoarding fetal and infant corpses in their morgue for up to 20 years. These horrors were uncovered when a French woman went to confirm what had happened to her child she had aborted:
""I wanted to verify that my child was cremated, like they said he would be," 27-year-old Caroline Lemoine was quoted as telling the paper. Following repeated requests for the date of cremation, the hospital acknowledged it had not disposed of the body."In a comment to the reporters, authorities said:
"There was no reason why those bodies should have been kept," Rosemarie Van Lerberghe, general director of the Paris public hospital system, said at a news conference. "I don't think we will find the same thing in other places."
Health Minister Xavier Bertrand described his shock at visiting the morgue, saying that the remains were stored in "disgraceful" conditions.
"I still have these disturbing images in my mind, these sacks and bottles of formaldehyde spread out," he told Le Parisien newspaper.Dr. Axel Kahn of the French national medical ethics board said:
"Even after the laws were changed, some specialists at Saint-Vincent-de-Paul may have wanted to keep the remains to do genetic testing on them one day,"The hospital has not addressed who kept the fetuses, or why. The remains were stored under lock and key in a two-room annex off the morgue's refrigerator room, news reports said. Only a handful of people had access to the rooms. I wonder if some Nuns will step up to try to buy them... it would make a great photo op for pro-lifers!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Useful Insight 4
 You scored as Socially Conservative Republican. Social conservatives share a belief in traditional morality and social mores and the desire to preserve these in present day society, often through civil law or regulation. The government should use its influence in the public square to support traditional family values.
Socially Conservative Republican | | 100% | Foreign Policy Hawk | | 95% | Libertarian | | 80% | New Democrat | | 70% | Pro Business Republican | | 70% | Old School Democrat | | 35% | Green | | 25% |
What's Your Political Philosophy?
created with QuizFarm.com
as if everyone didn't already know!!! I'm adding this one to the bottom in the permanant section!!!!
Useful Insight 3
 You scored as Cyclops. Cyclops is the team leader of the X-Men, and a skilled one at that. He loves Jean Grey very much. He's a strict and sometimes uptight leader, but he believes in his cause and he knows what he's fighting for... Peace between Mutants and Humans. Powers: Optic blasts
Cyclops | | 95% | Wolverine | | 85% | Emma Frost | | 85% | Jean Grey | | 70% | Beast | | 70% | Colossus | | 65% | Iceman | | 60% | Nightcrawler | | 55% | Rogue | | 55% | Storm | | 45% | Gambit | | 45% |
Most Comprehensive X-Men Personality Quiz 2.0
created with QuizFarm.com
The more I take these silly things, the more I find myself in those leadership slots... if you think X-Men's Cyclops and Monty Python's "Arthur, King of the Brittons" are a good way to rate leadership. I'll try not to let it go to my head.
More Healthy Self-Analysis
Take the quiz: "Which Holy Grail Character Are You?"
 Arthur, King of the BritonsArthur, son of Uther Pendragon, from the castle of Camelot. King of the Britons, defeater of the Saxons, Sovereign of all England! well, guess I should have known!
Commies VIII
Looks like the Chinese are getting too much into TOP GUN. They are currently refurbishing an old Russian Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier Varyag" These pictures are obviously out of date according to the Jane's information:  BEFORE MORE RECENT The scary thing is that the original official Chinese government information released seems to be a direct lie: The Varyag, is currently receiving refit at Dalian Shipyard to become a floating casino in Macao according to its owner, a Hong Kong/Macao based private company.Stepping back for an analysis: first they called it a casino, now JANE'S reports it has military markings painted on it? Anyone care to bet on what they plan to use it for? The problem here for an analyst of Chinese intentions is that Taiwan is the "current stated military objective". For those of you who don't know, Taiwan is about as far away from China's mainland as Martha's Vineyard from Massachuetts. You don't need to use an aircraft carrier when you can just launch from land. The real question is, what's the long term goal for this carrier? Where do the Chinese want to project their power? Don't tell me they don't have the ship power to mount a fleet, it only takes a pair of subs and a few Aegis platforms to make a defensive perimeter with all the tech the Chi-comms have stolen. Not to mention the other antiquated battle ships they have acquired from the Russians. Let's not forget that they are having their joint exercises with Russia too... and even test firing some intercontinental ballistic missiles. That's not good for us folks. Between when I started writing and when I published a new report hits DRUDGE: WAR GAMES SEEN AS MESSAGE from the Washington Times. Well DUH!!! I've been writing about this for 2 months! I'm just some dumb hick in "fly over country, volunteer orange section" and it's pretty freaking obvious to me! If I were in charge, I'd be beefing up our capabilities in the Western Pacific with some urgency. I'd also see what kind of strategic assets we have in the Western Indian Ocean. I think we are not far from conflict there.
John Roberts was asked to write a opinon in reference to a Supreme Court battle over some Catholic Nuns wanting the right to bury the 16000 fetuses stored in formaldehyde and plastic bags discovered behind the house of a man who managed a California medical facility that had closed. The Feminist Women's Health Center of Los Angeles sued to block the Catholics from having access under some bizarre twist of separation of church and state. Here is what is in the document: John Roberts concluded that a group's memorial service for aborted fetuses was "an entirely appropriate means of calling attention to the abortion tragedy." The Feminists had their way, preventing the display of the fetuses which would have been difficult to spin. You will note reader that we rarely if ever see such images in our news in spite of the shocking number of abortions each year. Perhaps with the advent of cell phone cameras more of these horrors will come out.  SAMUEL'S HAND STORY LINKED HEREIs Abortion a tragedy? In the future we will be seen as barbarians for the torture we inflict on the mothers and the murder of these children. It is the only rational outcome to this argument. Much like slavery, the truth becomes shockingly obvious to a more enlightened society. I believe our fight against abortion is only a matter of patience and prayer. Emancipation from abortion is a given path, only we have to be vigilant until the end is here.
Justice Nominee John Roberts has some serious questions to answer to: Did you really help an old lady across the street who then defrauded medicare by getting duplicate perscriptions when you were a Boy Scout? Is it true you like to eat dead animal flesh? Baby cows? Did you or did you not own the motor vheicle that killed a butterfly in 1972? Will you disavow any guilt in connection with all the homosexuals, murderers and other freaks you have had professional contact with? What abortion clinics have you bombed? Do you agree with the concept of the World Court and that they should have power over American citizens? Did you fly in an SR-71 blackhawk to Iran to negotiate regarding their nuclear weapons capability? Did you in fact frame a legal opinion in the manner requested by your employer as a legal aide while working for the Fascist Evil Reagan adminstration? Exactly how many trees have you personally been responsible for killing while creating your volumes of legal opinion? Have you replaced any of them? Did you at any time shake hands with Ollie North during your time in the Reagan adminstration thus facilitating the Arms-for-Hostages process? Do you have a set of tights with the letter "S" on under your shirt? Sarcasm is so much fun and Liberals make it so easy!!!
I'm seeing a nice news story about a Christian group rallying with such political stars as Tom Delay here in my home town, you can see it too through the link in the title. They are focusing on the aspect of "should the Church be involved with the state?" Meanwhile the cathedral of Praise in Nashville had a counter-rally of people who are against Christians trying to be political... (jee, I saw a lot of traditionally democrat voters in that crowd)... Such controversy! Heck, even my Sunday School teacher is asking us to question if we as Christians should be involved with the nomination process as a group. Are there groups of people banded on idealism based in reasoning that is counter to being Christian out there actively trying to influence this nomination? Do you stand by quietly and let them have a voice? If they are so strongly against Roberts shouldn't we as Christians take notice? Here is a protester's statement in the Newschannel 5 story: "I think that it's fine if people don't believe was we do but the people who are in power are trying to take those rights away from those who donÂt agree with them, said protestor Sylvia Jones."Hey Ms. Jones: are you aware that a regional Federal court almost removed the reference to God from our pledgallegiancegance? Is that really ok? Is that really what the founders of our country wanted? This leads to my next question: what rights do you believe that Christians would remove? What threat does a constitutionalist conservative pose to your day-to-day life? I would submit to you Ms. Jones that my rights are currently be affected by decisions of this court which are created not from our law but from "International Law" and other such completely unrelated sources. My last question to them is this: What would be the opinion of Chinese Christians on this issue? Should the state be bereft of Christian efforts? Where does that lead us? Will we as American Christians some day have to meet in secret, and be forced to sing silently as to avoid being discovered? Am I completely nuts? If you think so, ask yourself what small increments of law have brought us to removal of the 10 Commandments. Banning the Boy Scouts from using federal property becase they believe in God? Removing Nativity scenes from any state owned land? Where will it stop? The answer is that it won't stop until being a Christian is a crime. My rant is that over the past 30 years some awful things have come out of our court system. Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist Paper 78: the idea of the court system was to protect the arbiters of the law against "the despotism of the prince" and "the encroachments and oppressions of the representative body. We have even coined a lovely term to describe what has actually been happening: "judicial legislation". Our president has nominated a strong constitutionalist judge who is not given to fancifully interpretating the constitution and case law. It does not matter that Roberts might not be what we as Christians wanted when he hits the bench-that is outside of our control just as it has always been for every nominator's selection. What matters is that he looks acceptable as a constitutionalist up front and is not prone to judicial legislation. In spite of everything that the NARL and every other liberal extremist group has thrown at him, Roberts still looks good. I know he looks a heck of a lot better than anything that Kerry or Gore would have nominated. I support my president and think he has made an excellent selection. The answer is the Church must exert it's influence or be crushed by the state.
From the folks at NATIONAL ABORTION RIGHTS LEAGUE who brought you the only-makes-sense-if-you're-a-liberal SCREW ABSTINENCE party, they have now ripped the truth to shreds going after Roberts on some supposed incident in his record. Hey, it was so obvious a lie that a station in Bangor (that's in the People's Republic of Maine) pulled the plug on the ad saying ""After careful thoughtful analysis, we determined the ad was at worst false, and at best misleading,""
Now I have to change the whole tone of my rant because the folks at NARL have decided to pull the plug on the ad themselves. I smell a rat because if they were bold enough to put on that "Screw Abstinence" party a few months ago then something must have really kicked them in the pants. The only logical reason I see for them to backtrack is that their financial backers put the smackdown on this effort. So I guess the folks at NARL decided not to "screw" themselves financially and are going to make new commercials that their backers can stand. It's nice to see there is SOME LINE out there that even NARL backers won't cross. While to the rest of us that line is far beoynd a reasonable point of KILLING BABIES to begin with, there is at least some line too far for even them to go.
CLICK LINK IN TITLE You would never think that the Republicans were in power, nor would you think that our party knows how to walk tall. Right now there is a proposal for a "volunteer deputized Border Patrol citizen program" that puts an emphasis on "unarmed" citizen voluteers "assisting" border patrol agents.
""These would be volunteers who go through training, don't have a criminal background, who don't use firearms, and who would serve in a backup capacity to the Border Patrol," said U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who is one of the backers of the proposal."What-in-the-hell is the matter with those Republicans? They want to put a bunch of deputized Barney Fifes out there without even one bullet in their pocket?  I have questions for U.S. Rep John Culberson (R-Texas)and U.S. Rep Lamar Smith: The second amendment says we have the right to keep and bear arms. Yet you want to prohibit these volunteers from being armed? Prohibit law-abiding, deeply screened citizens from carrying weapons into an arena where there is a significant possiblity that they will face armed narcotic traffickers and possible terrorists? How exactly would these people "assist" like the "old days of the posse" without being armed? Second, aren't you from Texas? Since when has anyone from Texas been against a man carrying a sidearm? Let alone a REPUBLICAN from TEXAS! Ok, I'll admit the good points are that it creates a situation where the Border Patrol has to get it's S**T together because there will be closer monitoring by civillans. I can almost hear the swearing of the regional Border Patrol bosses as they realize they have to put up with some fired-up locals who are zealous enough about our border security that they'll patrol it for free. The thing I don't get is how that extra set of eyes and hands will help when push comes to shove in the desert. That part of this idea is dumber than when Speilberg digitally removed the guns from the authorities in his DVD release of ET to make it less scary. The only scary thing is at least ET was pretend, these border voluteers are facing something real. We've got to do something to nip our real border problem in the bud, but we shouldn't force people to do it unarmed.
YOU must read Dawn Eden's DAWN PATROL blog. There is a link in the title to a planned parenthood cartoon featuring a pro-choice cartoon crusader attacking abstincence promoters with a condom gun and sodomy lubricant.  I can't do the report justice like she can. Go check it out.
Having actually been to Somerset Kentucky, let me just ask you to click the link in the title before I share my thoughts on this.  How can our beloved government see fit to spend $7 million dollars to put a "Homeland security center" in Somerset? Let's analyize the decision making process: Somerset features the end/beginning of a grossly underused toll parkway (I swear you could sleep in the left lane of the east bound side and never worry about anything other than a stray opossum). It also has a super-Wal-Mart, McDonalds, and a man made lake. Their mall wouldn't pass muster as a t-shirt shop in Gatlinburg, but is the best mall for an hour drive around because it's the ONLY mall for an hour drive around. Their main industry is making those gosh-awful gigantic houseboats which can best be described as doublewides on the water, that must be a sure target for middle-eastern desert-born terrorists. In short, if you're white, uneducated, like mobile home living and blue collar working, then this is the hot spot to be. Check out these DETAILED STATS so you can see that I am not exaggerating in any way. In other words, a haven for yellow-dog-democrat "take from the rich and redistribute" voters. My three biggest questions to come out of my rant are this: 1) What did Cadiz, Mayfield and Moorehead Kentucky to to screw up an not get this pork boondoggle? 2) Isn't $7 million a lot to spend on a singlewide with a redwood deck, a kodiak ATV and a bass boat? 3) I thought it was the evil Republicans who were milking 911 for financial and political gain? How does THIS PORK do that in any way, and where are the democrats who decry such activities when they benefit the Republicans? ****** Side note to beautiful Kentucky wife: I am now pointing out that mutton is the BBQ of choice for most of Kentucky, I was just shooting for the pork-spending angle for effect.
Irony abounds here... we have liberated the Iraqi people, and they now want their formerly restricted sins including poronography. Much like the video dealers here in our country, porn is the way to make money. I say that because if a video store in the USA has a porn section, it is likely to be from 60 to 80% of total revenue. The story linked in the title is a brief profile of a family man trying to make some money to support his family. He's scared because the local militant religious zealots have shot and burned a fellow dealer. The actions of the zealots leads me to one of those rare moments when I do understand the fear of the extreme RIGHT in our country, as there are a few out there who would love to see porn dealers shot and burned. However that is such a tiny number of nuts in an otherwise healthy group of people in our country. The number is so small as to make them totally insignificant as a power base. Yet the liberals in our country would like to paint all of us "white christians" with the same brush. Is pornography wrong? Contrary to what some hardcore Liberals would have us think, sure it is. Can a Christian society tolerate porn? Not really. Can a free state eliminate and/or ban porn? Unfortunately no. The irony is that our liberation of Iraq will bring some bad with the good. The question comes in how do the Iraqi people deal with the availablity of the formerly restricted sins of the flesh?
Today's Washington Times article, linked in the title, has a report of an illegal alien who used someone else's birth certificate to land a job with the border patrol. Upon working there, he actively helped people cross the border! Looks like more good press for the Minutemen to me! I'll also bet we won't see this article in the LA Times. It's funny how that works sometimes, isn't it?
 Screamin Dean, my personal favorite liberal mouthpiece and current crowned king of the Democratic party made an unusual statement. He actually said something that is close to reality:
""What the propagandists on the right have done is make people afraid to say they are Democrats," Dean told a gathering of Vermont Democrats... "We need a message. It has to be clear,"" In my biased white-christitan-republican comparison of his other statements over the course of his leadership, I'd have to say that this was an unusually lucky shot that hit reality. I think we can safely say he'll be back to his crack-monkey antics soon enough.
IMPORTANT INSIGHT
discover what candy you are @ quiz meWell, it seemed important. I think it is healthy fun to take these tests. Just as long as you aren't looking for your next life choice from some celestial divination you are ok!
The Fascist Parallel
It was a war we were forced into by an act of horrible destruction. The enemy was fanatical and led by the orders they thought came from God. The enemy was so brainwashed into believing theirs was the one true way that they would willingly martyr themselves for the cause. Death was an honor in the service of their God. Our President stood firm and brought the resolution that this act would not go unpunished. Millions of dollars were spent to insure success, thousands of lives lost. The people of our country understood just like their President. It was going to cost lives to stop these madmen. Carrying the war to their home soil was going to be the only way to stop them. They struck here first, we would end it there. It was one of the few times in history that politics were genuinely united in one cause. Am I speaking of Bush and the Muslim terrorists? No, the time was WWII, the attack was Pearl Harbor. The presidents involved were Roosevelt and Truman. The enemy was Imperial Japan and the God was the Emperor Hirohito. We should look to this historical context for our understanding of the sacrifices and blood we are bound to spend to complete the objective. The objective of stopping a type of imposed fascisism.  Hiroshoma Memorial Here is a good context to consider: in one night of bombing 83,000 Japanese died, and they did not capitulate to the surrender. Eighty-three-thousand-yet they refused to quit. It took 2 atomic bombs to convince them. TWO. THEY DID NOT GET IT ON THE FIRST NUKE! This is a fanatical fascist for you. This is the week it happened, Hiroshoma on August 6th, Nagasaki on August 9th. Those of you who think what we are doing now is a "horrible quagmire" please consider the historical comparison I have presented here. Not to diminish any sacrifices here but so far it's been a relative cakewalk compared to the Pacific campaign of WWII. Please also understand that you having the right to speak your ignorant indignation also means that the side you are speaking under is not the fascist. Even though it sounds good on the evening news to call Bush a warmonger, he is really just making it possible for people like you to speak your mind. No matter how wrong you are.
Later Pete
Peter Jennings died this weekend. I'm a little surprised at my feelings about that. The Canadaian-with-a-highschool-education was my liberal training wheels from when I was old enough to decide to watch the news.  I remember turning to him when the first Shuttle Challenger blew up, I think I was 10 and at my grandmother's house on a sick day. I turned him on when Reagan was shot, and when Reagan was re-elected. I quit watching him when he was speaking of Clinton so highly. He never knew me, but I liked his style. I was very pleased with his efforts to recognize the WWII generation and their sacrifices. While I may not have agreed with him after my mind was turned on to it's conservative truths, I think we'll all miss him. I'm quite sure his death will later be seen to mark the end of the big three anchor era. See you later Pete. I'll be praying for your family too.
Love Beautiful Michelle
Michelle Malkin, you gorgeous and smart girl. Loved your take on the Bloomberg-ACLU-bag search story:
New Jersey Transit officials joined the New York Police Department in performing hapless random searches of Granny's knitting bag and Junior's Thomas the Tank backpack to prevent the next al Qaeda attack.
But not everyone is fighting the War on Terror blind. Some U.S. military personnel have been given a very clear and un-p.c. mission:
Be on the lookout for Middle Easterners carrying rocket launchers.
Thankfully, military watchdogs on guard against Islamist terrorists with rocket launchers know better than to stop Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan look-a-likes with Louis Vuitton pet carriers strapped around their shoulders.You should definitely read the rest of her rant HERE from Jewish World Review.
Make sure you check out the link to the JWR article in the headline. Thierry Delisha is a Jewish jewlry dealer who took a cab driven by muslim Hossam Abdala during a trip to New York. In a rush to unload at their destination, neither Abdala nor Delisha noticed the missed bag in the trunk- the one with "hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bridal jewelry". Oops! Delisha had no recipt, and was in a panic so he prayed and called everyone he could think of to pray. Abdala found the bag, and boy was he surprised as to its contents. A business card was in his back seat that matched the name on the bag, so Abdala tracked down Delisha, the rightful owner. There is something more to this somewhere. I'm just going to let you dwell on the power of God and prayer and think about it.
John Bolton, evil nay-sayer and psychotic anti-social appointee to the UN to represent the US, has now gotten China to work with us on a topic of mutual agreement.  On his 2nd day. Well, ain't that sumthin?
The NY Times is trying to look into the adoption records of supreme court nominee John Roberts? Just who the heck do you think you people are? This is a low, disgusting act. Here's my Email: To the Executive Editor, Managing Editor Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Chairman & Publisher Scott H. Heekin-Canedy; President; General Manager Your paper has already had enough bad press in the past, now you are looking to stick yourselves into more mud? What is your motive for searching the adoption records of Supreme Court Nominee Roberts? What could you possibly gain? I DEMAND TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK YOU WOULD FIND AND WHAT YOU WOULD WANT TO DO WITH IT! I am an adoptive father. I know what the process is like. I once thought of the press as being a great institution. For a while I thought it was just a mostly liberal mouthpiece, but now you have managed to bring it somewhere lower. What would you do with the information if you got it? I really want to know. What are you trying to gain? If I don’t hear from you by email I will dig up your phone numbers and start calling till someone answers my question. D- Now you can email them too: publisher@nytimes.com; president@nytimes.com; executive-editor@nytimes.com; managing-editor@nytimes.com Here is a number where you can leave a message: Byron Calame, who represents the readers, e-mail public@nytimes.com or call (212) 556-7652.
This time the ACLU may have actually alienated that core 15% of die-hard liberals with their suit. The latest lawsuit is against New York City for their subway searches on the heels of the London attacks from MUSLIM TERRORISTS. It argues that the measure also allows the possibility for racial profiling, even though officers are ordered to randomly screen passengers. The most disgusting thing to me is that Bloomberg already is publicly against racial profiling. This leads me to tell you a story: It was November 2001, and I had a business meeting. I was in Baltimore airport and got selected for the pat-down-wand-all-over and x-ray-nuke of my shoes. The screeners directed me to a cordoned off area with an oriental grandmother already going through the same probe. We were taking it in stride until the arabic 20 something year old male waltzed through security like it was made of soapbubbles. As you might imagine, this was the birth of my righteous indignation. Naturally I had heard about those oriental grandmothers knitting bomb vests and loading them with accupuncture needles. I also suspected that irish rednecks were well known for their ability to drive tractor bombs into cow pastures so we can go to our pub with Allah and the doe-eyed beer-toting serving wench virgins. Gathering my tone, I looked at my screener and said "I'm really surprised you selected us but let him walk right through with out a second glance." The oriental grandmother grinned and snorted at me. The screener was not quite as humorous but didn't try to cavity search me. The City already agrees with the ACLU and "does not support the use of racial profiling" according to Mayor Bloomberg. These idiots would hogtie and blindfold us when we are at war. Their motive against racial profiling is illogical and innane. Just because SOME of our ancestors chose to PARTICPATE in racial slavery and oppression does not mean we are doing it NOW. Not all of us are bigots and not all of us believe that people are so stupid as to see that non-muslims are usually not terrorists. Tell you what mayor, if you want to increase tourism start advertising that your officers are using muslim extremist racial profiling. It's sort of like giving guns to pilots and teachers and concealed carry permits to the general public. If you promote the message then you will make the terrorists think before they act. Possibly they will choose to act somewhere else. To heck with the ACLU, I would think your streets were safe from Muslim Terrorists. I don't know what reality they live in, but it isn't this one.
Commies VII
phew!!!! Dodged the bullet here, apparently the Chi-commies are not going to try to buy a US based oil company now. They still control the Panama Canal. Apparently even some advanced bloggers didn't know that little tidbit. Now we have joint exercises with Russia? Folks, believe this: we were better off when the Russians and Chinese didn't get along.  PHOTO CREDITS:
Chinese Defense Minister Cao Gangchuan (L) holds a welcome ceremony for visiting Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov in Beijing Dec. 13. Preliminary planning for the first-ever China-Russia joint military exercise currently underway. (Xinhua photo)
BURN ROVE AT THE STAKE... or
NOT... the NY TIMES has this extremely interesting article showing that Novak got his data from WHO'S WHO listing. The liberals are looking more and more like a bad episode of Scooby-Doo: "We woulda got away with it if it weren't for those meddling kids". 
Some genius thinks it will take $200 billion dollars to put together the healthcare records in a database and $48 billion per year to maintain it. You have got to be kidding me! I will personally bid $10 billion to set it up, and I'll run it for $500 million per year with $1 billion surcharge every 5 years for new investment. I'll bet that I could put it together and come away with a healthy profit!
guess the source, game II
Welcome frieds to another installment of guess the source where I find a quote on the internet, and you try to figure out who said it! "...a wife needs to comply with her husband's desires in bed..."If a man calls his wife to fulfill his needs, she must come, even if she is by the stove." They issued a severe warning against to any wife who rebels against her husband in bed. The Prophet said: "If a man invites his wife to bed and she refuses, and he is angry at her, the angels curse her until she wakes up in the morning." ...God is aware of men's needs. He knows that a man may have just come home, and maybe he desires something or maybe he saw something. He knows what this need is, and this is why he ordered the wife to consent to her husband, even if she is by the stove. Even if she is baking she must consent to him. Moreover... "Compare yourself to him, he's your paradise and your hell." ... The wife must consent to her husband's wishes and obey him."Is it A, B, C or D? A) Pat Robertson  B) Sean Connery  C)Sheik Muhammad Al-Munajid  D) Nominee John Roberts  The correct answer is C Just so you know, I kinda like everyone on this list, well, except for C of course.
|
